News Summary
The dismissal of law professor Felicia Branch from Bowen School of Law has ignited a fervent debate following her controversial statements on social media about the assassination of activist Charlie Kirk. Despite the Faculty Appeals Council suggesting a warning instead of termination, the chancellor upheld the dismissal, citing significant disruption caused by Branch’s comments. This incident underscores the tension between free speech and academic discourse, raising questions about educators’ responsibilities in politically charged discussions.
Controversy Unfolds at Bowen School of Law
In a turn of events that has certainly stirred up conversations both on and off campus, law professor Felicia Branch has been dismissed from her position at the Bowen School of Law. This decision follows a series of comments made by Branch regarding the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk.
Branch’s Comments Spark Backlash
On September 10, 2025, Charlie Kirk was assassinated during a public event. Following this tragic incident, Felicia Branch shared her views on social media that quickly caught the attention of the public and the university administration. In her posts, Branch labeled Kirk as “evil” and went on to express that she would not “pull back from celebrating” his death. This inflammatory rhetoric linked Kirk’s ideologies to the advocacy of guns, suggesting that they represented “his branch of evil.” Branch’s comments were also a direct response to Kirk’s own controversial statements regarding gun deaths, framing his views as a callous willingness to accept loss for the sake of preserving Second Amendment rights.
The Unfolding Investigation
Amid mounting pressure from political figures—including Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders, who deemed Branch’s remarks “unacceptable,” and Attorney General Tim Griffin who echoed similar sentiments—Branch was placed on a suspension with pay starting September 16, 2025. An official investigation was initiated to look into her comments, including reviewing her online posts that seemed to celebrate Kirk’s demise and equate mourning for him with actions of the Ku Klux Klan.
Difficult Decisions and Outcomes
As the investigation wrapped up, the university officially dismissed Branch on September 24, 2025. The decision came with the university stating that her comments had caused significant disruption within the campus community. Although Branch was given five business days to seek a review of her dismissal, the Faculty Appeals Council—meeting in October—suggested a less severe warning rather than outright termination. They viewed Branch’s posts as a misstep, showing some leniency towards her initial intentions.
Ultimate Resolution and University Response
Despite the Faculty Appeals Council’s recommendations, Chancellor Christina Drale made the final call to uphold the dismissal, citing the considerable disruption to operations at the Bowen School of Law. In a statement, Drale reaffirmed the university’s commitment to freedom of expression while expressing a strong opposition to “violent rhetoric.” The dismissal letter outlined that Branch’s actions constituted a serious violation of ethical and professional standards expected of law school faculty.
Understanding the Context
This situation highlights the challenging balance between protecting free speech and maintaining a respectful academic environment. With comments that many considered extreme, Branch’s case has ignited debates surrounding the responsibilities of educators and the appropriate boundaries of discourse, especially in light of a tragedy like Kirk’s assassination.
The Road Ahead
As of now, Branch is no longer part of the Bowen School of Law community, where she had only recently joined in July 2025 to teach in the Low Income Taxpayer Clinic. The fallout from this incident is likely to continue resonating well beyond the campus, as it brings to light larger discussions about political discourse, the ethics of educators, and how we process and react to loss in the public sphere.
In the coming weeks and months, both students and faculty members may find themselves engaged in conversations that help define the values of their academic community. One thing is for certain: this is a pivotal moment that calls into question the delicate intersections of ideology, ethics, and educational integrity.
Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic
- THV11 News
- Northwest Arkansas Online
- KATV News
- Reuters
- Arkansas Online
- Wikipedia: Freedom of Speech
- Google Search: Charlie Kirk
- Google Scholar: Academic Freedom
- Encyclopedia Britannica: Academic Freedom
- Google News: UALR Law Professor Fired
Author: STAFF HERE FLORENCE WRITER
The FLORENCE STAFF WRITER represents the experienced team at HEREFlorence.com, your go-to source for actionable local news and information in Florence, Florence County, and beyond. Specializing in "news you can use," we cover essential topics like product reviews for personal and business needs, local business directories, politics, real estate trends, neighborhood insights, and state news affecting the area—with deep expertise drawn from years of dedicated reporting and strong community input, including local press releases and business updates. We deliver top reporting on high-value events such as the Florence Festival of Lights, Pee Dee Pride, and agricultural expos at the Florence Center. Our coverage extends to key organizations like the Florence Regional Chamber of Commerce and the Pee Dee Area Council of Governments, plus leading businesses in healthcare and retail that power the local economy such as McLeod Health and Pee Dee Electric Cooperative. As part of the broader HERE network, including HERECharleston.com, HEREColumbia.com, HEREGreenville.com, and HEREHiltonHead.com, we provide comprehensive, credible insights into South Carolina's dynamic landscape.
